Production Partner Onboarding Pack
Use this pack when a Beam conversation moves from "interesting" to "we are seriously considering one production workflow."
This pack is buyer-facing first. It is the shared document both sides should be able to read before a call, before a pilot, and before a go-live discussion.
The public path still starts here:
The canonical 1.0.0 production definition now lives here:
What This Pack Is For
Use it to keep the first production conversation narrow and honest:
- one named workflow,
- one sender and one recipient,
- one buyer-side owner,
- one operator owner,
- one explicit success condition,
- one next decision after the first proof.
Do not use the first production discussion as a broad "agent platform" tour. The first job is to decide whether the named workflow deserves a real go-live path.
Canonical 1.0.0 Workflow
Beam 1.0.0 is anchored on one concrete production shape:
Quote Approval Partner Handoff
In plain language:
- a buyer-side procurement agent asks a supplier or partner-side operations agent for stock, delivery timing, and a quote,
- the partner-side agent responds on the same Beam thread,
- the buyer-side operator and finance owner can inspect the trace, the proof, and the next action without losing the request history.
Read the full contract in First Production Partner Workflow Contract.
Buyer Expectations Before The Evaluation
Before the call starts, the external team should already know:
- Beam is for one company handing work to another company with a visible paper trail.
- The first production path is scoped to one real workflow, not a broad rollout.
- The goal is to inspect the proof and decide whether one hosted pilot and go-live checklist make sense.
- The likely next step after a good call is a narrow workflow rollout, not an open-ended beta promise.
What We Need Before Scheduling
Collect these six inputs before the first serious session:
- The first workflow in one sentence.
- The sender and receiver sides.
- The buyer-side business owner.
- The operator who will care when the handoff stalls.
- The success condition for the first pilot.
- The blocker or risk that makes visibility matter.
Intake Checklist
- Company name
- Primary team email
- Workflow type
- One-paragraph workflow summary
- Estimated number of agents or systems involved
- Internal owner on the buyer side
- Clear reason this workflow matters now
Production Readiness Prerequisites
These are the six prerequisites Beam operators track directly in the dashboard before go-live:
- Workflow owner confirmed
- Sender and receiver confirmed
- Success metric confirmed
- Security review confirmed
- Go-live window confirmed
- Proof recipients confirmed
If any of these are missing, the request should stay explicitly blocked. Do not hide go-live risk inside free-form notes.
Expected Timeline
The first production motion should feel boring:
- Guided evaluation
- confirm the workflow and the operator proof path
- stop if the workflow is still vague
- Scoped pilot
- agree on one owner, one success condition, and one proof package
- record reminders, next meeting, and next action in the request record
- Go-live review
- walk the Production Go-Live Checklist
- mark any blocked prerequisites in the dashboard
- First production window
- keep one operator owner on the thread
- use the same trace, signal, and proof surfaces as the pilot
- Proof recap and decision
- send the proof pack
- decide whether to expand, narrow, or stop
What The Guided Evaluation Should Cover
The canonical sequence is:
- Restate the buyer workflow in plain language.
- Show the First Production Partner Workflow Contract.
- Show the healthy Beam overview baseline.
- Open one request trace and walk stage by stage.
- Explain what happens when follow-up is async or delayed.
- Confirm what a hosted pilot and go-live path would look like if the fit is real.
Proof Checklist
The evaluation is only good if the proof is clear enough for a normal buyer to repeat back.
Show all of these:
- a healthy operator baseline,
- one request trace from arrival to reply,
- one explicit owner and next action,
- where go-live blockers would be tracked,
- what happens when the handoff needs follow-up later,
- where an operator would look if the flow stalled.
What The Buyer Should Leave With
At the end of the evaluation, the buyer should have:
- a clear answer on whether Beam fits one workflow,
- a shared understanding of what the first pilot would cover,
- one named owner on both sides,
- one concrete next action,
- one clear picture of what has to be true before go-live,
- no confusion about whether self-hosting or repo setup is required first.
Operator Preparation Checklist
Before the call:
- confirm the public guided evaluation page still reflects the current proof path,
- make sure the workflow contract still matches the production story,
- open the dashboard and confirm the system baseline is healthy,
- know which follow-up template matches the likely request stage,
- have the onboarding pack and the go-live checklist open in the same browser session.
After the call:
- update the request stage,
- assign or confirm owner,
- record the next action,
- record last contact time,
- record blocked go-live prerequisites if any are missing,
- send the correct follow-up template.
Follow-Up Templates
These templates are intentionally short. The goal is clarity and next action, not marketing copy.
Template: New Request Acknowledgement
Subject: Beam production workflow review received
Hi {{name}},
We received your Beam request for {{company}}.
The next step on our side is a quick workflow review so we can confirm whether the first production-shaped handoff is narrow enough for a pilot. We will use the workflow summary you sent to assign an operator owner and send the right proof path before the call.
What we need from you:
- the first workflow in one sentence
- who sends the work
- who receives it
- what a good outcome looks like
Reference:
- Guided evaluation: https://beam.directory/guided-evaluation.html
- Workflow contract: https://docs.beam.directory/guide/production-partner-workflow
- Onboarding pack: https://docs.beam.directory/guide/design-partner-onboarding
Best,
{{operator}}Template: Reviewing / Clarification Needed
Subject: Beam workflow clarification
Hi {{name}},
We reviewed the request and want to keep the first production discussion narrow.
Before we schedule anything, please reply with:
- the first sender and receiver in the workflow
- the one handoff that matters most
- the person who owns the result if it stalls
- the success condition that would count as "ready to proceed"
Beam works best when the first production path stays focused on one real partner handoff instead of a broad platform rollout.
Reference pack:
- https://docs.beam.directory/guide/production-partner-workflow
- https://docs.beam.directory/guide/design-partner-onboarding
Best,
{{operator}}Template: Contacted / Next Action Sent
Subject: Beam workflow next step
Hi {{name}},
Thanks for the context. The next step is {{next_action}}.
Before the session, please review:
- the guided evaluation path: https://beam.directory/guided-evaluation.html
- the workflow contract: https://docs.beam.directory/guide/production-partner-workflow
- the onboarding pack: https://docs.beam.directory/guide/design-partner-onboarding
The call will stay focused on one workflow, the proof Beam shows for it, and whether that workflow deserves a real pilot and go-live review.
Best,
{{operator}}Template: Scheduled Evaluation
Subject: Beam evaluation scheduled
Hi {{name}},
Your Beam evaluation is scheduled for {{date_time}}.
What we will cover:
- the workflow in plain language
- the Beam proof path for one request
- what a narrow hosted pilot and go-live checklist would include if the fit is real
Please bring:
- the business owner for the workflow
- the operator or technical owner who will care when it stalls
- the success condition for the first pilot
Reference pack:
- https://docs.beam.directory/guide/production-partner-workflow
- https://docs.beam.directory/guide/design-partner-onboarding
Best,
{{operator}}Template: Active Pilot Follow-Up
Subject: Beam pilot is active
Hi {{name}},
Beam is now active for the scoped workflow we agreed on.
Current owner: {{owner}}
Current next action: {{next_action}}
If the workflow stalls, we will use the operator path to inspect the trace, confirm the current stage, and decide the next recovery step. We will also keep any go-live blockers attached to the same request instead of splitting them across separate notes.
Best,
{{operator}}Template: Closed / Not The Right Fit Right Now
Subject: Beam workflow follow-up
Hi {{name}},
Thanks again for the conversation.
We are closing the current Beam request for now because the first workflow is not narrow enough yet, the timing is not right for a hosted pilot, or the go-live prerequisites are not ready yet.
If that changes, the best restart is:
- one workflow
- one sender
- one recipient
- one success condition
When that exists, restart from:
- https://beam.directory/guided-evaluation.html
- https://beam.directory/hosted-beta.html
Best,
{{operator}}